Wybens Louis*, DMD, MSc, MPH, MHA
Prosthodontics treatment using a post to restore fractured crowns on where an endodontic procedure had been performed, might be suffered to some failures. This event remains a signiï¬cant health issue that can beneï¬t an intradisciplinary approach, involving both the endodontist and the prosthodontist, as an alternative to improve the outcomes. This article purpose is to review the opportunities for coordinated
intradisciplinary care between those specialties through the concept of complementarity relationship under “configuration” theories, by testing whether intraprofessional collaboration in dentistry, through an integrated practice, can improve the prognostic of prosthesis crown & bridges using dowel posts on endodontically treated tooth and estimate how it affects treatment failure.
We had conducted a longitudinal cohort study (retrospective study) using data collected from two dental facilities in Port-au-Prince, where patients had received treatment from 2006 to 2013.
Our analysis revealed that factors like the duration of treatment (2.20 (1.6-3.0); 4.80 (4.0-7.0)) and the number of roots (1.50 (1.3-2.0)) which have significant proficiency statistically (p<0.001) to induce failure to appear to be increased in effect when considering a solo-based practice. It also appears in our findings that using cast gold posts to restore fractured crown might be regarded as a protective factor (0.78 (0.56 - 1.08); p<0.1) for the restored tooth. Although some articles have supported the use of prefabricated post/core in restoring endodontically treated teeth, our findings suggest that permanent coronal restorations should have taken place as soon as possible to prevent fracture and then failure, whatever the type of materials we made the post/core. Intradisciplinary action among dental colleagues on caring issues requires, to be successful, that all parties to be involved in reducing post-treatment complications and failures, by addressing on a common front all that can be considering as a potential risk and compromising to the final restoration. This paradigm appears to be the feature of the complementary system, which allows through an integrated approach the way to apprehend coercive elements.